PRS regulation is letting tenants down - report
Published by Anonymous for 24dash.com in Housing and also in Regulation
Westminster negotiates lower private rents on former council flats
Tenants and landlords are paying the price of the rising tide of regulation in the private rented sector while rogue landlords get away with poor practice, according to a new report.
The study says "costly and complex regulatory systems" are pushing up rents and preventing more investment in the PRS at a time "when it needs to expand to help tackle the housing crisis".
Written by Michael Ball, professor of urban and property economics at the University of Reading’s Henley Business School, and Commissioned by the Residential Landlords Association, the report contends that:
• The worst landlords are unlikely to co-operate with current legislation as they are simply “unfazed” by the prospect of facing punishment.
• Landlords surveyed for the report support regulation to drive out rogue operators. But they find the current system unfair and burdensome and say it doesn’t help them deal with problem tenants.
• Tenancy deposit schemes are poor value for money- costing the sector more than £275 a year in fees and administration, when only £7 million is returned to tenants annually in deposits judged to have been unreasonably withheld.
• Landlord registration schemes are costly and ineffective. The worst landlords avoid the schemes- with better landlords picking up the costs.
• The poorest tenants and the most affordable properties are the worst affected by the costs of regulation.
According to professor Ball: “Further major private investment in rental housing is needed in the face of the UK’s growing housing crisis. But it is likely to be held back by a failure to recognise the negative consequences of the way in which state regulation currently engages with the private rented sector.
“Regulation has a perverse effect of raising better landlords’ costs but not those of poor ones, because unscrupulous landlords continue to ignore legislation and so face no costs of it. Therefore, paradoxically, regulation can worsen the position of better landlords and thereby leave more of the market to bad ones.”
The report recommends an extensive cost benefit review of all current and future regulation to encourage more investment in the sector.
Alan Ward, RLA chairman, said: “I would urge the government and opposition to listen to professor Ball’s findings.
"Given that there are over 400 different regulations applying to the private rented sector, a cost benefit review of all of them is needed to ensure that we have effective regulation which is not placing an unnecessary cost burden on landlords and tenants.
“At the local level, a system of co-regulation would enable landlords to join an industry-led accreditation scheme that would use strong sanctions such as independent property inspections as a measure of deterrence against poor practice. This would give councils the freedom to target non-members who do not act within the remits of the law.”