Frank Field targets 'fairness' in housing association allocations with new bill

Accessibility Menu

Frank Field targets 'fairness' in housing association allocations with new bill

Published by Jon Land for 24dash.com in Housing
Thursday 26th January 2012 - 5:08pm

Frank Field targets 'fairness' in housing association allocations with new bill Frank Field targets 'fairness' in housing association allocations with new bill

Other housing stories

Labour MP Frank Field has targeted fairness in housing association allocations in a new bill introduced to the House of Commons under the Ten Minute Rule Motion.

The bill would ensure that the allocation of social housing is done on the basis of giving priority to tenants with an "exemplary tenancy record".

Mr Field told MPs that those judged good citizens could form a "premier division" who would have first choice of all social housing that becomes available.

The bill would also place a duty on housing associations to inform potential tenants about the conduct of existing tenants in neighbouring properties.

This would, he said, "bring on side" housing legislation with people's "gut feeling of fairness".

Mr Field's bill was granted a second reading on 30 March, however it is unlikely to become law due to a lack of parliamentary time.

Explaining the objectives of the bill in his column for the Wirral News, the Birkenhead MP wrote: "Three aspects of local housing association policy makes many of you angry. The first is how houses are allocated. Many of you feel that constituents who don’t play by the rules, get the best housing when it becomes available.

"The Bill I introduced on Tuesday will ensure that those tenants get housed, but only after those families who, work hard, and whose children do not cause a problem, have selected the houses they would like.

"Complaint number two centres on the way many housing associations seem to parachute neighbours from hell from one area into another. The Bill will give tenants the right to be told about the conduct of new tenants and have the right to object.

"The third deeply felt grievance comes from tenants who unsuspectingly choose a property, move and then find that they had landed themselves next to one of those chaotic neighbours from hell. Under the Bill tenants will have to be told why previous tenants have vacated their tenancy.

"My Bill will put housing associations on the same footing as owner occupiers wishing to sell. A homeowner, plagued by anti-social behaviour, has to inform potential buyers of such information, or face the possibility of being sued for misrepresentation. The same law will apply for housing associations.

"Of course this doesn’t increase the numbers of new homes. It makes the allocation of existing homes fairer."

Comments

derrickchung - http://derrick chung

Commented 3 weeks ago

I seem to remember having made previous comments/challenges only to collapse into a pile of ho- haw later on . The third deeply felt grivance etc, Why tolerate neighbours from Hell. This is ASB that all landlords should deal with promptly. How will this help people desperate for a home as this will be recorded as a refusal, and question whether a person is in need of a home or not. Has Mr Field ever heard of the term Q-jumping. Lets see if this is another case of Guts and no Balls

londoner - http://

Commented 3 weeks ago

Some residents may perceive that 'problem' tenants get the best housing, but in all my years as a social housing HA tenant I have never observed anything of the kind. There is a problem for social housing landlords - what to do with the seriously anti-social tenants. Currently they do just circulate round the HAs properties, as there is nowhere else for them to go. The problem with Frank Field's proposal to reward 'good' tenants with more points, apart from it being overwhelmingly patronising and infantilising, is that the end result will be even heavier concentrations of problem tenants in 'sink' estates. Those who have mental health problems with occurrences of, for example, psychosis and paranoia will end up living where their mental illness will be made much worse. Single mothers who work long hours for a pittance and whose young teenage son is getting into trouble but could be rescued will find themselves living where they don't stand a chance, on an estate full of alcoholics, drug addicts and violence.
If this is the outcome he intends, Frank Field should say so, along with an explanation of what he proposes to do about 'sink' estates. Put up barriers and introduce involuntary euthanasia? The real answer is to properly fund intensive intervention, proven to be successful. It is costly, but this is repaid many times over in saved prison and other costs, and the cycle of unemployability, of anti-social behaviour down the generations, or of addiction is broken. It would have to go with proper youth provision and ongoing programmes to prevent growth of gang culture. This would be the most productive way forward, not regardless of the recession but because of it.

Please Login to comment

To comment you must be logged in. You can either Login or Register

LATEST #ukhousing TWEETS

FACEBOOK RECOMMENDATIONS

Latest jobs

Latest jobs

Find and search more jobs in our Jobs Site...

Latest 24dash poll

Can social landlords provide broadband for tenants without state funding?


previous polls Previous polls

Latest blog posts

Lynne Featherstone

"MP meets local apprentice as Haringey sees record number of young people join apprenticeships"

Published by Lynne Featherstone

Gene Spencer-Salmon is one of a record number of young people who are pursuing apprenticeships in Haringey this year....

Phil Morgan

"Mansion Tax not Bedroom Tax?"

Published by Phil Morgan

One of the more compelling articles recently has been by Suzanne Moore when she argued that “Instead of being...

Colin Wiles

"Putting our housebuilding in order"

Published by Colin Wiles

The re-written National Planning Policy Framework will be issued in the next few weeks. If the government fails to...