'Civic pride' can't drive local transport schemes » Local Government » 24dash.com

Accessibility Menu

'Civic pride' can't drive local transport schemes

Published by webmaster for 24dash.com in Local Government
Thursday 8th June 2006 - 11:21am

Dr Stephen Ladyman MP Dr Stephen Ladyman MP

Other Local Government stories

MPs accused a minister today of ignoring the views of elected local councillors in deciding transport schemes.

Transport Minister Stephen Ladyman hit back by saying some councillors pressed for transport projects on the grounds of "civic pride" rather than value for money.

Mr Ladyman found himself having to staunchly defend Government policy when giving evidence to the House of Commons Transport Committee.

Committee members expressed anger that some light rail and tram schemes had been turned down by the Government.

Graham Stringer (Lab: Manchester Blackley) asked why Mr Ladyman thought he knew better than local people about things.

Mr Ladyman replied: "If we are providing money, then we owe it to Parliament and the people to exercise our judgment."

Mr Stringer said: "You are substituting your judgment over the judgment of elected local councillors. You are imposing your judgment on local people."

Mr Ladyman replied: "I entirely reject that."

Mr Ladyman told the committee that the Government decided on light rail schemes on value-for-money grounds.

He said that sometimes local authority political leadership had a different sense of value for money than the Government.

Mr Ladyman said that, when talking to some local councillors, he had gained the impression that they were sometimes "putting significant weight behind civic pride" in pressing for schemes to go ahead.

Committee chairman Gwyneth Dunwoody (Lab: Crewe and Nantwich) said: "Is civic pride a sin, then?"

Mr Ladyman replied: "If civic pride is something they want to assume, they need to pay for it and not see it as a transport objective."

Mr Ladyman agreed with committee members that bus passenger numbers outside London were disappointing and this was something the Government was trying to do something about.

He admitted that local authorities had little control over deregulated bus companies but could influence them by such things as the provision of bus lanes and priority routes.

Copyright Press Association 2006

Comments

No comments yet...

Be the first and post your views below.

Please Login to comment

To comment you must be logged in. You can either Login or Register

Latest jobs

Shoreline Housing PartnershipAsset Investment Manager

Rate: up to £43,680
Type: Permanent
Location: Yorkshire & Humberside

Shoreline Housing PartnershipHome Options Officer

Rate: up to £19,983
Type: Contract
Location: Yorkshire & Humberside

Vicinity Housing GroupClerical Officer

Rate: £14,733 - £15,728 pa (Band 3)
Type: Permanent
Location: North West

Campbell TickellExecutive Director - Finance

Rate: £95,000 plus benefits
Type: Permanent
Location: Eastern (inc. Herts and Essex)


Find and search more jobs in our Jobs Section...

Latest 24dash poll

What will be the biggest single issue facing social housing providers in 2010?






Previous polls

Latest blog posts

timkidson

"The couple"

Published by timkidson

For SME’s including family businesses, the most powerful and groundbreaking work to generate business success often...

jonathonporritt

"Time to press the panic button?"

Published by jonathonporritt

Apologies for the six weeks blog-oliday. Put it down to Copenhagen blues! I’m still reeling from the surreal sight of...

Yvonne Hutchinson

"RSL, RPL, What’s the difference?"

Published by Yvonne Hutchinson

I’ve just read the Communities and Local Government paper, The private rented sector: professionalism and quality...