Disabled dog-owners loses appeal against 'discriminatory' eviction
Other Housing stories
- Pickles blasts prayers ban ruling - 'worship is hard-fought British liberty'
- Fact or Fiction? Tower blocks
- Council wrapped over revealing tenants' 'social housing status'
- Crowded Oxford shelter lets rough sleepers use floor
- Private landlord fined for allowing tenants to live in 'hell-hole' home
Advertisement
A woman who says her dog is the reason for getting up in the
morning lost a legal battle today to be allowed to keep pet Alfie
at her housing association flat.
Three Court of Appeal judges expressed sympathy for Dee
Thomas-Ashley, who suffers from mental health problems, but
rejected a challenge brought against her landlords.
Sir Scott Baker, giving the ruling of the court in London, said
Alfie, a Jack Russell/Border Collie cross, lives with Ms
Thomas-Ashley in her one-bedroom flat at Itchen Court, Crombie
Close, Lovedean in Hampshire.
"Unfortunately the appellant's tenancy agreement does not allow
dogs to be kept on the premises," he said.
Drum Housing Association told her Alfie would have to leave, said
the
judge: "When he did not they took proceedings for possession
against her in the Southampton County Court."
Sir Scott said the county court held that Ms Thomas-Ashley, a
divorced mother-of-four who has been a tenant at Itchen Court since
June 2006, had no answer to the claim.
He said she appealed on the grounds that "she has a disability and
the presence of Alfie is critical to her health".
Ms Thomas-Ashley said she "cannot enjoy the premises without him"
and claimed the association was in breach of duty under the
Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in maintaining the "no dogs"
provision in her tenancy agreement.
Her case was that the possession order should not have been made
and should be "set aside".
Sir Scott said Ms Thomas-Ashley "suffers from a condition called
Bipolar Mood Disorder which is a complex disorder characterised by
cyclical and episodic disturbances in mood which, at their extreme,
fulfil criteria for manic as well as depressive episodes".
Rejecting her appeal, the judge said: Whilst one inevitably has
sympathy for the predicament in which the appellant finds herself
this is not a case where the interpretation of the legislation can
be stretched in order to assist her. Its meaning is clear."
She had failed on the facts found by the county court judge to show
that the "no animals" term discriminated against her on the grounds
of her disability.
Her disorder could not "trump" her contractual agreement with her
landlords or the interests of the other occupiers of Itchen
Court.
Ms Thomas-Ashley had said in a witness statement: "Alfie is my
reason to get up every morning."
The UK's most up-to-date social housing and public sector news website
