Third of housing association chiefs 'have had pay frozen' - Smith & Williamson
Other Housing stories
- Pickles blasts prayers ban ruling - 'worship is hard-fought British liberty'
- Fact or Fiction? Tower blocks
- Council wrapped over revealing tenants' 'social housing status'
- Crowded Oxford shelter lets rough sleepers use floor
- Private landlord fined for allowing tenants to live in 'hell-hole' home
Advertisement
Nearly a third of housing association chief executives have had
their pay frozen during the past 12 months, according to new
research from Smith & Williamson.
The accountancy group's annual survey of senior level reward also
showed that 47% of respondents expect housing association pay
levels to be frozen in 2010.
According to Smith & Williamson: "Inflationary trends are a key
influence for 61% of respondents, so it is not unexpected that the
median expected rise is just 0.5%.
"However, 47% expect to freeze their pay levels and the remainder
predict a median rise of 1.25%. The highest predicted rise is
2.5%."
By matching the returns of the participants who have participated
in the survey two years running, Smith & Williamson also
revealed that executive pay has increased by an average of 2.1%
over the past year while the average pay rise given to all staff in
this group was 2.2%.
Survey findings:
- 31% of these Chief Executives have had their pay frozen.
- 44% received increases of between 2% and 4%.
- The highest pay rise recorded was 7.2%.
Bonus culture
Most executive bonus schemes are discretionary and closely
regulated by the association’s board or remuneration
committee.
Smith & Williamson reports that associations face a common
dilemma, torn between setting up an objectively based scheme and
ensuring sufficient room for discretion.
Boards are focused on seeing a tangible improvement in corporate
performance before bonus payments are made, but are still unsure
about the quantum of payments to executives. As a result,
many prefer to focus reward on basic pay.
Findings:
- 42% of respondents operate some form of bonus scheme for their employees.
- 36% of Group Chief Executives were eligible for a bonus, but only half of these received a payment in the last 12 months. The average bonus received was 12.5% of basic pay (up from 7.3% last year).
- 26% of Chief Executives of single entities were eligible for a bonus. 86% of these went on to receive a bonus, with average payments of 6.7% (down from 7.7% last year).
Gender pay gap
With the Equalities Act due to be come law in 2010, equal pay
issues remain a hot topic. The Smith & Williamson housing
association executive reward survey analyses the overall reward
packages of senior level employees at single and group housing
associations across the UK.
The average gender pay gap was analysed by hierarchical level
amongst participants to compare the earnings of female and male
workers.
The signs of progress in the sector are encouraging:
- At Chief Executive level, the gap has narrowed from 29.5% last year to 23.5% this year.
- At Group Director level the gap this year is 16%.
- At single entity Director level the differential remains slight - last year it was 2.6%, and this year it stands at just 2.4%.
By comparison, the Office for National Statistics reported in November 2009 that the overall full-time gender pay gap in the UK has narrowed slightly over the past year from 12.6% to 12.2%. At managerial level, the gap is 20.2%.
The UK's most up-to-date social housing and public sector news website

BlackKatz - http://www.blackkatz.com
Commented 115 weeks ago
I just don't understand why there is still a gender pay gap - is this a hangover from women not working so long because of time off for childcare etc, or is it still inherently sexism?