Flint sparks anger with first speech as housing minister
A minister was today accused of risking a "return to the workhouse" after saying the unemployed should have to seek work or lose their council homes.
Housing minister Caroline Flint said there was clear evidence that there are many long-term unemployed in social housing who may be able to find employment with the right support.
And she suggested that new council tenants who can work could have to sign "commitment contracts", agreeing to actively seek employment.
Housing charities criticised the idea.
Shelter chief executive Adam Sampson said: "The Government wants to return Britain's unemployed to the workhouse by throwing them onto the streets.
"What is being proposed would destroy families and communities and add to the thousands who are already homeless.
"We accept there's a problem with some unemployed people shying away from work, but the Government must find other ways to tackle the issue like revamping the housing benefit system."
Alan Walter, chairman of the Defend Council Housing pressure group, said: "This is obviously part of a long-running strategy to try and stigmatise council housing as housing of last resort.
"It runs alongside continuing blackmail on tenants and councils to privatise council homes, asset stripping public land for private development and forcing people into the private market."
Leslie Morphy, chief executive at Crisis, the national charity for single homeless people, said: "Social housing now contains some of the most vulnerable people in society.
"Our experience at Crisis shows that encouragement and enablement - and not threats - are the way to help homeless and vulnerable people to build independent lives."
David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, which represents England's housing associations, said: "Such a policy would be unfair and impossible to enforce.
"Many of the jobs open to people, especially at the lower skills end, are insecure or temporary. Also, people with health problems, such as mental health issues, may find there are periods when
they cannot keep up their job.
"Instead of taking a punitive approach, the Government should build upon the successful employment schemes already being run by housing associations around the country."
The Chief Executive of Child Poverty Action Group, Kate Green, said: "Homelessness will not end worklessness. The Minister's comments are insulting and stigmatising to people facing major barriers
to employment.
"Communities with a high concentration of worklessness result from poor planning that concentrates social housing. Years of expert warnings have recommended housing developments should be mixed and
it's time the Minister dusted the cobwebs off these reports instead of chasing headlines.
"The Government must stop trying to manage the lives of the most disadvantaged people at the sharp end of a stick and address their genuine needs.
"Investment in skills development, disability support and the rollout of comprehensive childcare in disadvantaged communities will meet the Government's employment targets and move towards their
important promise to end child poverty."
In her speech to the Fabian Society in London, Ms Flint said: "Council and social housing must continue to support the most vulnerable in society, but it should also be a springboard to
opportunity, not just a safety net."
Ms Flint called for a national debate on breaking the link between social housing and unemployment following a dramatic fall in the number of council tenants in work over the past 25 years.
She also set out proposals to build more affordable homes for first-time buyers and families and for council tenants to be given the right to claim compensation when services fall short.
The jobseeking contracts could be extended to existing tenants in a move which would affect up to a million people.
As well as actively searching for work, the documents would require signatories to undertake skills checks to ensure that they are equipping themselves for potential jobs.
The suggestion comes as statistics reveal the number of unemployed council tenants has risen by 20% to 55% since 1981.
Ms Flint said: "The link between social housing and worklessness is stark. I am concerned about what has been called a collapse in the number of people in council housing in work over the past 25
years.
"Council housing was originally somewhere which brought together people from different social backgrounds and professions but this has declined. We need to think radically and start a national
debate about whether we can reverse this trend, and have strong, diverse estates with a mix of people."
She went on: "We all agree that social housing is about more than bricks and mortar - more than handing over the keys and leaving tenants to get on with it for the next thirty years. And it isn't
so many years ago that a council house was something to prize.
"I believe that we can recapture that sense of pride, creating a culture within social housing that promotes opportunity and social mobility, inspiring people to take control of their own
lives.
"We are winning the argument but I want to try to establish a national consensus that building more homes - including more social and affordable housing - is absolutely the right thing to do. That
will remain my first priority, and I intend to make sure that the momentum continues to build over the coming months."
The UK's most up-to-date social housing and public sector news website

COMMENTS
Jon Land
Commented 29 weeks ago
Great way to start a new job, alienate all the people you are going to work with over the next few years with your maiden speech. Does this signal a shift in the Government's approach to social housing?
douglas
Commented 29 weeks ago
congratulations to the housing minister for having the guts to say what most of the ordinary working people in this country know is going on, well done and thankyou
Djinn
Commented 29 weeks ago
Obviously she is not a lawyer. or if she is she is a very bad one.
michael barratt
Commented 26 weeks ago
The neo conservatives of New Labour have already introduced even more coercive forms of labour market policy than previous Conservative governments, in an environment where relative wages for unskilled workers have declined over the past two decades. With wages for skilled workers relative to unskilled workers having increased by about 35% during the last two decades.
Previously comparatively well-paid and stable work for blue-collar male workers has been replaced in the new economic sectors by an insecure working environment characterised by temporary contracts, low pay and deskilled work. The result of the growth in those new economic sectors is the appearance of a disenfranchised urban poor. In recent times, the responsibility to pay subsistence wages has in effect shifted from employers to the general taxpayer. With employers paying hourly rates for unskilled labour that are barely sufficient to keep eighteen year olds living at home with their parents. Resulting in family breadwinners paid less than subsistence wages having their incomes topped up by family credits to around the level of poverty.
Although Income support/Job seekers allowance from personal experience are not an easy options, many households find they are financially better off relying upon welfare benefits rather than a combination of wage and family credits, when all factors are taken into account. Especially given frequently poor sick pay entitlements and complexities associated with varying weekly incomes at the subsistence level.
Especially in the South of England, the lack of council housing is such that generally only those with the most need are provided housing and by extension those housed are more likely to be reliant upon welfare benefits system. It is not surprising there is some indifference to the work ethic among welfare recipients given there is little difference in hardship experienced living on poverty level welfare benefits compared with living on below subsistence wages topped up with family credits to the level of poverty.
Ms Flint appears to intend to escalate labour coercion to new heights in proposing that council tenants face losing their homes if they do not find work, often elusive and temporary work at that. Ms Flint and her neoconservative colleagues having failed to coerce sufficient numbers into work for below poverty level pay in frequently precarious employment are attempting to introduce housing insecurity as a coercive weapon. Former blue collar families who have already seen their incomes and standards of living eroded over the years now face having the roofs taken from above their heads.
Ms Flint and her colleagues, rather than yet again kicking the poor in the teeth would be better employed building more council housing to accommodate more mixed communities and addressing rather than exacerbating the present social injustice.
Michael Barratt
Please Login to comment
To comment you must be logged in. You can either Login or Register