Elderly disabled woman 'failed by Havering Council'

Accessibility Menu

Elderly disabled woman 'failed by Havering Council'

Published by webmaster for 24dash.com in Housing
Monday 26th November 2007 - 12:33pm

Elderly disabled woman 'failed by Havering Council' Elderly disabled woman 'failed by Havering Council'

Other Housing stories

Failures by Havering Council meant that an elderly, disabled woman had to live in completely unsuitable accommodation for at least five years longer than necessary, according to a report by the Local Government Ombudsman.

In his report, Tony Redmond said that the council failed to consider the woman’s housing needs and her human rights, and recommends the local authority pay £10,000 compensation.

Sadly, the complainant died before the issue of the Ombudsman’s report, so the compensation should be paid to her daughter.

‘Mrs Oak’ (not her real name for legal reasons) was 86 years old, partially sighted, deaf, and suffered from bronchial asthma and arthritis in all major joints. She lived with her daughter and grand-daughter in a second-floor three-bedroom maisonette, which was reached from street level by three sets of 14 steps. There was no lift. She could not manage the stairs to reach the property or those within the maisonette to her bedroom and the only bathroom without assistance.

Her daughter, the tenant, applied for a transfer for the family to a property with level access and asked the council to award her additional priority due to Mrs Oak’s medical problems.

Mrs Oak complained that the council took too long to deal properly with the housing transfer application and, as a result, she had to live in completely unsuitable accommodation.

In January 2003, a council officer visited Mrs Oak to assess her housing needs, and reported that she was “practically a prisoner in the home”.

The Ombudsman added: “That tragic, deplorable and wholly preventable circumstance did not improve in the intervening years.”

The Ombudsman finds that the council had delayed in dealing properly with the transfer application and that Mrs Oak had had to live in unsuitable accommodation for at least five years longer than she should have. Sadly, between the issuing of the draft and this final report, Mrs Oak died.

The Ombudsman also concludes that the council neglected to consider Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which says that everyone has the right to respect for his/her private and family life.

The Ombudsman found maladministration causing injustice.

The council’s recent offer of suitable accommodation addressed the family’s housing needs, but in addition, the Ombudsman recommends that the council:
• pays compensation of £10,000 to Mrs Oak’s daughter; and
• reviews all rehousing applications over the last five years to see whether others have been affected in a similar way, and apply appropriate compensation to anyone so affected.

Don't miss the 24dash.com audio bulletins for the latest news and information - http://www.24dash.com/podcasts

Comments

No comments yet...

Be the first and post your views below.

Please Login to comment

To comment you must be logged in. You can either Login or Register

LATEST #ukhousing TWEETS

FACEBOOK RECOMMENDATIONS

Latest jobs

Latest jobs

Find and search more jobs in our Jobs Site...

Latest 24dash poll

Can social landlords provide broadband for tenants without state funding?


previous polls Previous polls

Latest blog posts

Lynne Featherstone

"Mike tells Boris what he things of his piddling cut in council tax!"

Published by Lynne Featherstone

Mike Tuffrey always did have a way of telling it like it is. In my day on the London Assembly it was Ken on the...

Anne Rowlands

"Size, it's all relative"

Published by Anne Rowlands

I found myself agreeing with the findings of the recent Chartered Institute of Housing report - Does size matter - or...

Andy Boddington

"Janet Street-Porter is right about Willy Wonka managers at the BBC but so wrong about local radio"

Published by Andy Boddington

In today’s Independent on Sunday, col