Study reveals 'true extent' of passive smoking threat to children
Other Health stories
- Housing groups to offer care and support services through new health consortium
- Landlord puts family of eight 'at risk' over gas safety failure
- East London and Manchester have UK's highest levels of child poverty - research
- Shapps launches 'new deal' to help older people live independently
- 'One million pensioners to go hungry' this Christmas
Advertisement
Doctors today called for a ban on smoking in all vehicles after
a new report revealed passive smoking causes at least 22,000 new
cases of asthma and wheezing in children every year.
The report from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) found more
than 20,000 chest infections, 120,000 bouts of middle ear disease
and 200 cases of meningitis in youngsters are also thought to be
linked to the effects of second-hand smoke both inside and outside
the home.
Furthermore, 40 babies die from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDs)
every year caused by passive smoking - one in five of all SIDs
deaths.
Professor John Britton, chairman of the RCP's tobacco advisory
group, said legislation to ban smoking in the home would be
unenforceable so instead views of "what is acceptable" had to be
changed to protect the two million children who live in homes which
allow smoking.
But a total ban on smoking in cars and vans would be easier to
police than the current situation which expects enforcement
officers to differentiate between business and private vehicles, he
said.
"We would recommend a ban on smoking in all vehicles," he
said.
Prof Britton said even drivers who never had child passengers
should get out of their cars before lighting up for reasons of road
safety.
Current smoke-free legislation is due for review this year and Prof
Britton said it was an opportunity to "close remaining gaps".
Richard Ashcroft, a professor of bioethics at Queen Mary,
University of London, who contributed to the report, said the
review also gave opportunities to clamp down on smoking in public
places frequented by children.
Prof Britton said this could include banning parents from smoking
around the school gates but added it would be difficult to
legislate for situations in private gardens.
The report said passive smoking results in more than 300,000 GP
consultations for children, some 9,500 hospital admissions and
costs the NHS about £23.3 million each year.
Prof Britton said: "Many parents believe that smoking in only one
room or when the children have gone to bed will somehow protect the
children from exposure. It doesn't."
Funded by Cancer Research UK and carried out by the UK Centre for
Tobacco Control Studies, partly based at Nottingham University, the
research found that children whose parents both smoked were almost
nine times as likely to be exposed to second-hand smoke as those in
non-smoking families.
The RCP called for increases in the real price of tobacco, measures
to tackle tobacco smuggling and illegal trading, and investment in
media campaigns targeted at young people.
Cigarettes should also be taken off display in shops while
packaging should be made generic and standardised, doctors
said.
Other measures include cutting down exposure to images of people
smoking in the media - with films and television programmes which
show gratuitous smoking classified as adult viewing - and stiff
penalties for those who sell cigarettes to under-age
youngsters.
Janet Davies, executive director of nursing and service delivery at
the Royal College of Nursing, said: "Today's report should come as
a stark warning to anyone who smokes around babies and
children.
"The serious damage second-hand smoke causes to the long-term
health and well-being of children is entirely avoidable and must be
prevented."
Betty McBride, director of policy and communications at the British
Heart Foundation, said: "All parents want the best for their
children, yet many are making their kids breathe a toxic fog of
tobacco fumes which only damages their health."
Simon Clark, director of the smokers' lobby group Forest, said: "If
you ban smoking in cars, which is a private space, it's a small
step to banning smoking in the home. Both measures are unacceptable
and unenforceable."
A Department of Health spokeswoman said: "By increasing the level
of awareness of the harmfulness of second-hand smoke, particularly
to children, we will encourage people to voluntarily make their
homes and private cars completely smoke-free."
The UK's most up-to-date social housing and public sector news website

Harleyrider1978
Commented 98 weeks ago
More ill informed smoker bashing. I do not think the authors would argue with me that smoking over the last 60 years smoking has more than halved (UK 1948 66% of the population, 2009 22.5%) but asthma has risen by 300% (again in the UK). So smoking is not the primary cause of asthma and atopy, I assume the doctor’s cars and industrial pollution. The inconvenient truth is that the only studies of children of smokers suggest it is PROTECTIVE in contracting atopy in the first place. The New Zealand study says by a staggering factor of 82%.
“Participants with atopic parents were also less likely to have positive SPTs between ages 13 and 32 years if they smoked themselves (OR=0.18), and this reduction in risk remained significant after adjusting for confounders.
The authors write: “We found that children who were exposed to parental smoking and those who took up cigarette smoking themselves had a lower incidence of atopy to a range of common inhaled allergens.
“These associations were found only in those with a parental history of asthma or hay fever.”
They conclude: Our findings suggest that preventing allergic sensitization is not one of them.”
http://www.medwire-news.md/…/…gic_sensitization_.html
This is a Swedish study.
“Children of mothers who smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day tended to have lower odds for suffering from allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, allergic asthma, atopic eczema and food allergy, compared to children of mothers who had never smoked (ORs 0.6-0.7)
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between current exposure to tobacco smoke and a low risk for atopic disorders in smokers themselves and a similar tendency in their children.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm…pubmed/ 11422156
In conclusion let’s have a balanced debate and not characterise smokers as race akin to the devil.